<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Cutthroat Stalker &#187; insects</title>
	<atom:link href="http://scarles.org/blog/cutthroat-stalker/tag/insects/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://scarles.org/blog</link>
	<description>essays and musings on fly fishing for native trout</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 13:58:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Lakeside Developments &#8211; Good for Fish?</title>
		<link>http://scarles.org/blog/cutthroat-stalker/1766/lakeside-developments-good-for-fish/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=rss</link>
		<comments>http://scarles.org/blog/cutthroat-stalker/1766/lakeside-developments-good-for-fish/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 19:25:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cutthroat Stalker (Scott)</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Asides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fish]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freshwater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[undeveloped]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scarles.org/blog/?p=1766</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lakeside developments shown to impact content and quantity of fish's food.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p id="top" />A recent study, <a href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/08/090803092111.htm">Lakeshore Development Reduces Food Supplies For Fish</a>, found:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;In the four [sample] lakes, terrestrial insects comprised up to 100 percent of the diet of fish in undeveloped lakes, in contrast to a maximum of 2 percent in developed lakes, a pattern that was also apparent at the regional and national scale.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>What implications does this have for you when your favorite undeveloped fishing lake gets developed?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://scarles.org/blog/cutthroat-stalker/1766/lakeside-developments-good-for-fish/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

