<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Cutthroat Stalker &#187; access</title>
	<atom:link href="http://scarles.org/blog/cutthroat-stalker/tag/access/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://scarles.org/blog</link>
	<description>essays and musings on fly fishing for native trout</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 13:58:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Reminiscences of Utah&#8217;s HB 187</title>
		<link>http://scarles.org/blog/cutthroat-stalker/1519/reminiscences-of-utahs-hb-187/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=rss</link>
		<comments>http://scarles.org/blog/cutthroat-stalker/1519/reminiscences-of-utahs-hb-187/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 11:54:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cutthroat Stalker (Scott)</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Asides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Info]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utah HB 187]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fly fishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[holston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[river]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tennessee]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scarles.org/blog/?p=1519</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Property owners along the Holston River try to exert/enforce/enact their real/imagined rights along the river which is causing friction with anglers there.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p id="top" />Oh no, it looks like some anglers in <strong>Tennessee </strong>are having some problems very familiar to those of us in Utah who just dealt with HB 187. Property owners along the <strong>Holston River </strong>are trying to exert/enforce/enact their real/imagined rights along the river which is causing friction with anglers there. Read about it over at <a href="http://flyfishmagazine.blogspot.com/2009/06/access-fight-on-soho.html" target="_blank">flyfishmagazine</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://scarles.org/blog/cutthroat-stalker/1519/reminiscences-of-utahs-hb-187/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Utah&#8217;s New Public Easement Ruling</title>
		<link>http://scarles.org/blog/cutthroat-stalker/108/utahs-new-public-easement-ruling/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=rss</link>
		<comments>http://scarles.org/blog/cutthroat-stalker/108/utahs-new-public-easement-ruling/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 12:45:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cutthroat Stalker (Scott)</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Info]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fishing access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fishing rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[private property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[property rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ruling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[utah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[utah fishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[utah fishing rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[utah supreme court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[utah water access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water easement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scarles.org/blog/?p=108</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now, who has the cojones to take up the gauntlet the Utah Supreme Court has dropped? Anyone for testing Utah's new public easement ruling to determine what is "reasonable and cause[s] no unnecessary injury to the landowner"? ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p id="top" />The Utah Supreme Court has handed down their ruling on public easement on state waters. The ruling favors public access instead of restricting it! The ruling comes as a big surprise to me because of my perception that many Utahns are very territorial, bordering on paranoia in some cases, when it comes to land ownership and the government (not so much that others are given access to their property, but that the government is telling the landowners what can be done with their property). Also, the preponderance of agricultural interests in the state.</p>
<p>This will mostly affect our local Cache Valley angling in the Blacksmith Fork River. In the last two years land owners have begun posting their land along portions of the bottom 5 miles of river. These were some of my favorite spots I had fished for over 20 years.</p>
<p>Last summer I talked with the security man posting signs. He said that the land had been owned for quite a few years by several absentee landowners. I asked if he would tell me who they were so I could contact them for permission to fish the water. He said they wouldn&#8217;t grant permission because they wanted to keep the fishing for themselves. Now I can fish there again!</p>
<p>The other place that will open up is about 20 miles of river along the upper Blacksmith that is owned by the Millers Brother&#8217;s operation. Many fishing enthusiasts have long desired to fish there. Now they have the chance.</p>
<p>There are sections of The Little Bear River that runs through the Paradise/Avon end of Cache Valley that will be affected as well. There are a couple of private fishing operations there. One is owned by a friend of mine. We&#8217;ll see what happens.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.sltrib.com/outdoors/ci_9923629" target="_blank">Salt Lake Tribune Article</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.utcourts.gov/opinions/supopin/Conatser071808.pdf" target="_blank">Utah Supreme Court Decision</a></p>
<p>Forums discussing the issue:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.utahonthefly.com/forums/showthread.php?t=19008" target="_blank">Utah on the Fly</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.bigfishtackle.com/forum/Utah_Fishing_Forum_C55/Off_Topic_Board_F112/_Utah_Supreme_Court_has_ruled_P430782/" target="_blank">Bigfishtackle.com</a></p>
<p><a href="http://outdoorsbest.zeroforum.com/zerothread?id=768872" target="_blank">Fly Fisherman</a></p>
<p><a href="http://166.70.44.77/comments/read_comments.asp?ref=9923629&amp;sec=Features" target="_blank">SL Tribune</a></p>
<p>And it showed up at <a href="http://moldychum.typepad.com/moldy_chum/2008/07/utah-supreme-co.html" target="_blank">Moldy Chum&#8217;s place</a>.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: line-through;">Now, who has the cojones to take up the gauntlet the Utah Supreme Court has dropped? Anyone for testing Utah&#8217;s new public easement ruling to determine what is &#8220;reasonable and cause[s] no unnecessary injury to the landowner&#8221;? </span></p>
<p>I have talked with friends who are land owners here in Utah. Some idiots think that the ruling gives them permission to trespass and trash property. If you want to see the benefits of this ruling, you have to be reasonable and respectful to private property. Come on people, use your brain!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://scarles.org/blog/cutthroat-stalker/108/utahs-new-public-easement-ruling/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

