depiction of animal cruelty [including dead animals] with the intention of placing that depiction in interstate or foreign commerce for commercial gain, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both.” Let’s hope none of you catch a grass carp in Michigan, kill it, take a picture of it and post it to your blog which I then view in Utah, since it is illigeal to have/kill a grass carp in Utah.
essays and musings on fly fishing for native trout
Asides
Law with potential “cruelty” impact
U.S. v. Stevens case in which the following law is being challenged: “Whoever knowingly creates, sells, or possesses a
depiction of animal cruelty [including dead animals] with the intention of placing that depiction in interstate or foreign commerce for commercial gain, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both.” Let’s hope none of you catch a grass carp in Michigan, kill it, take a picture of it and post it to your blog which I then view in Utah, since it is illigeal to have/kill a grass carp in Utah.
depiction of animal cruelty [including dead animals] with the intention of placing that depiction in interstate or foreign commerce for commercial gain, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both.” Let’s hope none of you catch a grass carp in Michigan, kill it, take a picture of it and post it to your blog which I then view in Utah, since it is illigeal to have/kill a grass carp in Utah.
Table of Contents
Cutthroat Stalker’s Gallery
Fly Fish Literati
29 members
Fly Fish Literati is a group of readers dedicated to those writers who have blended the experience o...
29 members
Fly Fish Literati is a group of readers dedicated to those writers who have blended the experience o...
Copyright © 2008, 2009, 2009 Scott Carles. Subscribe to Cutthroat Stalker 
Discussion
No comments for “Law with potential “cruelty” impact”