Good News for the Cruelty and Fishing Debate

If you haven’t heard by now, stirrings in the plant field may help tone down some rhetoric in the cruelty to animals debates. Researchers in Israel have recently published information that

Recent evidence demonstrates that plants are able not only to perceive and adaptively respond to external information but also to anticipate forthcoming hazards and stresses. Here, we tested the hypothesis that unstressed plants are able to respond to stress cues emitted from their abiotically-stressed neighbors and in turn induce stress responses in additional unstressed plants located further away from the stressed plants.

Rumor Has It…: Relay Communication of Stress Cues in Plants

It’s actually an interesting article. But the good part is that there are already people arguing for plant rights as seen in this opinion piece in the NY Times article, If Peas Can Talk, Should We Eat Them? by Michael Marder. Now, before you sperson too much, the Swiss are already a legume up on everybody with a publication from their Federal Ethics Committee on Non-Human Biotechnology (ECNH) titled “The dignity of living beings with regard to plants: Moral consideration of plants for their own sake.”

Of course, there is also a backlash. Here are a couple:

So, with a shortage of potential food stuffs and biotic things that people want to worry about, there is the possibility that those who are of such persuasion will be out of the gene pool soon, and we won’t have to worry about the issue. Just biding our time…

Be Sociable, Share!


No comments for “Good News for the Cruelty and Fishing Debate”

Post a comment


Cutthroat Stalker’s Gallery

Grain Field baldy Blue Water Rock Monticello Rear Out of Focus Lizard beetle front abandoned cabin dan-chris The Unknown Angler yellowstone cutthroat
Fly Fish Literati
Fly Fish Literati 29 members Fly Fish Literati is a group of readers dedicated to those writers who have blended the experience o...

Books we plan to read

View this group on Goodreads »